Social and Environmental
Research Institute

278 Main Street, Suite 404, Greenfield, MA 01301
phone: 413-773-9955, e-mail:

spacerspacer
spacerspacerspacer

All material © SERI unless otherwise noted.

 spacer spacer

The Social and Environmental Research Institute conducts research on a broad range of social and environmental issues, while emphasizing topics related to discursive approaches to policy and social relations to the environment. The Institute conducts applied research projects that realize the practical gains provided by theory and that act as a means to realize concrete benefits to individuals, society, and the environment. SERI was founded in 1995 as a non-profit research institute.

NEW WEB PAGE ABOUT HUMAN IMPACTS FROM OIL SPILLS AND SPILL RESPONSE

Follow this link.

News at SERI

  • SERI received a new grant from the National Science Foundation to study the connection between a process for making a decision and the satisfaction that people have with the resulting decision. This is known as the fair process effect. Tom Webler is the PI. (More information is available by following this link.)

  • SERI received a new grant to study harmful behaviors of divers and snorkelers to coral reefs in Puerto Rico through systematic observation and to test the effectiveness of pre-trip media-based interventions. Tom Webler is the PI. The two year project is funded by NOAA. (More information is available by following this link.)

  • Anticipating the severe human impacts that are likely to emerge as a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil leak in the Gulf SERI researchers Tom Webler and Seth Tuler, along with their colleague Kirstin Dow at the University of South Carolina, sent a memo to the Unified Command, OSHA, and others with recommendations to pro-actively address the potential impacts. The recommendations are based on our on-going project on the social disruptions of oil spills and spill response.

  • Tom Webler and Seth Tuler, along with their colleague Kirstin Dow at the University of South Carolina, wrote an Overview of human impacts from oil spills as an invited essay posted on the Center for American Progress website.

  • SERI has written an editorial on the need to include social science research in the design and engineering of new energy technologies. It will appear in a forthcoming issue of Energy Policy. Download the pre-print.

  • Seth Tuler recently gave an invited presentation on "Lessons from the past: Addressing facility siting controversies" at the Workshop on Addressing the Challenges of Climate Change Through the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, National Research Council, December 3-4, 2009. Download the powerpoint presentation slides.

  • Seth Tuler received an NSF Professional Development Fellowship on factors that enable longterm institutional management systems to anticipate, recognize, and respond to failures (July 2009 - June 2011). This Fellowship is based at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where Seth is a Research Associate Professor. The Fellowship includes training in groundwater hydrology, fate and transport of contaminants, and other technical issues and a research component where he will investigate longterm stewardship systems in two to three cases (more).

  • SERI board member Seth Tuler spent four months during 2008/2009 as a Fulbright Scholar at the Faculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Rangsit Center, Pathumthani, Thailand. He studied the public health risk communication activities about air emissions from petrochemical facilities located at the Maptaphut Industrial Estate in Rayong Province. He also gave a series of presentations about environmental health risk communication to government agencies and industry. Powerpoint presentations and explanatory notes in Thai may be found by following this link.

Previous news items may be found by following this link.

Current Projects

  • NEW PROJECT: A communicative approach to understanding the association between procedural performance and legitimacy of outcomes (more).

  • NEW PROJECT: Characterizing harmful behavior of divers and snorkelers to coral reefs in Puerto Rico through systematic observation and testing the effectiveness of pre-trip media-based interventions (more).

  • Informing coastal management adaptation planning and decision making for climate change using an interactive risk-based vulnerability assessment tool (more).

  • Study to characterize effects, vulnerabilities, and the adequacy of existing data to inform decision-making regarding the social disruptions from oil spills and spill response (more)

  • Case study of longterm human impacts and vulnerabilities from the Exxon Valdez oil spill (more)

Research Themes

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND RISK ASSESSMENT AND DECISION MAKING

The Institute conducts research on public participation in environmental and risk assessment and decision-making at all stages of policy processes, including design, research, decision making, implementation, and evaluation. Our research in this area aims to improve understandings and develop processes that seek just, equitable, and integrative solutions by deliberating issues; clarifying interests and values; informing deliberations with high quality information; addressing issues of power and influence; discovering common understandings; identifying mutual responsibilities; and negotiating shared principles. It includes both development of theories of public participation and guidance for design of processes that are sensitive to the specifics of situational contexts.

We have conducted a series of research projects to investigate the ways that context matters in preferences for process features and the ways that preferences for process are linked to preferences for outcomes, including

  • the factors that influence local government officials' decisions to participate in regional watershed planning (more) and

  • the inter-relationships of people's preferences for process features, preferences for outcomes, perceptions of the context, and their personal experiences and motivations in environmental and risk decision-making (more).

A second stream of research relates to how different people define 'success' of public participation. There are a variety of ways that 'success' can be defined. It depends on who is doing the defining and the context. Development has theory has been an important component of our work, with its basis on the normative criteria of fairness and competence (as described initially in a book co-edited by Tom Webler). Our empirical work on this topic has included:

  • how participants in a forest planning process define 'good' process (more);

  • how stakeholders think ecological risk assessment workshops for oil spill response planning should be organized (more); and

  • evaluation of the substantive impacts of the Sustainable Rural Community Development Project in Vermont and the public involvement processes the project used (more).

Recently we have focused attention on the role of evaluation for improving process and for empowering interested and affected parties to be more effective participants. In particular, we are comparing the ways that different evaluation techniques empower local communities to be more effective participants in the clean-up of contaminated sites (more).

A list of theoretical and empirical research publications on public participation may be found by following this link.

SOCIAL DIMENSIONS OF RISK

The Institute's research on the social dimensions of risk explores the ways that social and institutional factors affect the risks from hazardous technologies. These factors can include individual risk perceptions, social networks, and organizational behaviors. In addition, our work explores the effects of risk management efforts, and opportunities for their improvement. We are particularly interested in translating the findings of research into decision making to address environmental exposures.

The social dimensions of risk have been investigated in several recent projects, including:

  • community responses to risk communication and the role of social networks in the formation of risk perceptions about low dose radiation exposures (more);

  • public health risks from Department of Energy nuclear weapons facilities and nuclear testing fallout (more);

  • the human dimensions of wildland fire (more); and

  • marine oil spill response (more).

A list of publications related to the social dimensions of risk may be found by following this link.

VULNERABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE

The Institute conducts research on vulnerability and environmental change in a variety of policy domains, including marine fisheries, coastal ecosystem management, and wildland fire management. Our research in these area develops understandings of the driving forces that exacerbate social and ecological vulnerabilities to hazards and management responses to them. Our work has been conceptual, by exploring the relevance of, for example, vulnerability in fisheries management. Our work has also sought to develop methodologies for improving assessments of vulnerability and environmental change.

The Institute's work on vulnerability has been focused on New England marine fisheries. Those engaging in fishing-related activities and the communities in which they live face many and varied pressures. Declining fish populations and the associated regulatory responses impose constraints on fishing activities and can exacerbate economic and social pressures on fisheries stakeholders. Other factors such as increasing coastal development and shifting demographics have brought additional threats to the sustainability of fisheries and those dependent on them. A large number of factors - or driving forces - may contribute to individual and group vulnerability. Our work is investigating the utility of considering vulnerability in the assessment of potential impacts from fisheries management measures (more).

Additionally, the Institute has engaged in projects related to the role of models in assessing impacts of nitrogen loading in coastal embayments, with a focus on how models may be transferred from one ecological and social context to another (more). For example, we explored how local officials use nitrogen loading models in local decision making and how scientists (modelers) view the information requirements of local decision makers.

A list of publications related to vulnerability and environmental change may be found by following this link.