Building community civic capacities for effective engagement
This Guide identifies a wide range of issues that a community ought to weigh when considering whether or not to host a facility to store SNF and/or HLW. The fact is, trying to answer such a variety of questions in a meaningful way will require a great deal of leadership, time, and resources. It will require the participation of many members of a community, not just local officials. Other local residents and organizations who are interested in a proposed CISF will want an opportunity to engage in the assessment and decision processes. A published paper on this topic is available here.
In short, the ability of local officials, residents, and interested organizations to participate effectively and meaningfully in a siting process begs the question:
How will the community develop the capacities to engage effectively in a technically complex and potentially controversial process to ensure all concerns are addressed?
There are six categories of community civic capacity that your community should consider and develop. They will support your ability to effectively engage in facility siting decision processes. Your community should strongly request funding and support from federal and state agencies to enhance your community’s civic capacities.
Leadership
Leaders help bring diverse parties together under a shared vision and foster constructive collaboration around often contentious issues. Whether they are formal representatives or respected voices within the community, they play a key role in other capacities such as mobilizing participation and promoting institutional collaboration. Leaders help reveal shared values and enhance the credibility of the process while also helping communities to navigate the technical, environmental, social, legal, and political considerations. of large-scale energy projects.
Building leaders can happen through training programs or by mentoring. Many organizations offer trainings. Equally important is creating institutional and cultural support that enables leadership to flourish. Organizational structures that encourage shared decision-making, recognition of emerging leaders, and ongoing dialogue amplify the impact of individual leadership efforts. For instance, forming working groups, rotating facilitation roles, and using action learning teams to address local energy challenges all nurture the collective dimension of leadership development. These strategies help embed inclusive, transparent practices into the community’s ethos, reinforcing a sense of shared responsibility for facility siting outcomes.
Explanation:
People with influence or authority in the community. May be political leaders or laypeople who are viewed positively by many in the community.
Ways to build/enhance:
Leadership training, mentoring and coaching systems, reflective practices.
Resources
Resources include physical items, finances, or technology that support learning, engagement, and decision making. Time and physical space are resources. Examples include:
Adequately sized and comfortable spaces for community meetings and dialogue,
Technology and tools that facilitate engagement (e.g. online meetings), information gathering (e.g. surveys), data gathering and analysis, and alternatives assessment (e.g., systems dynamics modeling),
Availability of and access to models and datasets,
Community newspapers and websites, and
Finances.
Building these capacities requires strategic partnerships. For instance, establishing reliable meeting spaces might involve collaboration with local government offices, schools, or community centers, while securing technology (e.g., computers, internet access, audiovisual equipment) might require grant writing or corporate sponsorships. Skills such as facilitation, website development, or surveying public speaking can be strengthened through workshops, mentoring programs, and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing. Local universities, nonprofit organizations, or professional associations can help provide these programs, while government grants or philanthropic funding streams can cover training costs. Equally important is designing systems to manage and coordinate volunteers’ and staff members’ time, ensuring that their commitments are respected and scheduled in a way that does not overburden any one individual or group.
Explanation:
Physical, financial, technological, and analytical resources that support learning, participation, dialogue, and decision making
Ways to build/enhance:
Outside funding to the community, fundraising from inside the community
Knowledge
Knowledge refers to the understanding of information, be it derived from Western science, passed down as traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), or accumulated through lived experience or professional practice. It can be specific to a local place or be more generalized. It can be about technology, environmental impacts, economics, or community preferences. When knowledge is curated—by educational institutions, advocacy groups, extension services, or other social entities—it can be shared, debated, and put to work in constructive ways.
Topics relevant to the siting of a nuclear waste facility that are important for a community to understand are discussed here.
The capacity of knowledge can be expanded or enriched through workshops, community forums, and citizen science initiatives. For example, participatory research projects might train local residents in data collection and analysis, enabling them to generate insights about environmental conditions, social impacts, or technical feasibility. Collaborative efforts between community colleges, universities, and local organizations can further enrich the local knowledge base. At the same time, intangible or experiential sources of knowledge like farmers’ observations of soil changes, teachers’ awareness of local youth needs, or elders’ recollections of past development projects should be recognized.
Project developers who are frustrated by a community’s hesitancy to support a project proposal often retort that “the public needs to be educated!” This so-called Knowledge Deficit Theory presumes that people’s opinions are shaped by their knowledge and opposition is due to a failure to completely understand the proposed. While knowledge and information about the project is important, how people gain that knowledge is also important. Moreover, it should be recognized that people’s opinions about the suitability of a facility are shaped by feelings, fears, values, and hopes in addition to their knowledge.
Explanation:
Usable, relevant, and valid information including information about how to find and learn new knowledge
Ways to build/enhance:
Informational sessions, teaching critical thinking, data analysis, etc. skills, implementing citizen science projects
Civic Engagement Skills
Civic engagement skills include reasoning, problem-solving, consensus building, conflict resolution, and effective communication. People these skills and the confidence and willingness to use them.
Building and enhancing engagement skills can be achieved through education and training initiatives such as workshops on conflict resolution and critical reasoning, or programs that coach residents in public speaking and persuasive communication. Encouraging retention among local government staff and community leaders sustains institutional memory, allowing lessons from past experiences to inform current decisions.
Local governments can fund community education programs and reduce barriers to participation, such as scheduling public meetings at convenient times and providing childcare. Expert facilitators can clarify ground rules and police behavior in civic discussions. Educational institutions can prepare youth and adults alike for civic engagement by teaching the principles and skills of civics and democratic governance to develop communicative competence. Community members themselves have a role to play as well, whether it’s committing to vote, volunteering on local committees, or championing the voices of underrepresented neighbors, they can help to promote a sense of collective efficacy. By working together, all these stakeholders help foster an environment where people are confident, informed, and ready to engage in shaping their community’s future.
Explanation:
Actors are motivated, have skills, and efficacy related to reasoning, problem-solving, consensus building, conflict resolution, and communication
Ways to build/enhance:
Trainings in collaborative learning and consensus-building. Build self-efficacy by advertising successes
Civic Culture
Civic culture refers to the shared worldviews and daily practices reflect how a community understands itself and engages in public life. It encompasses norms like active participation, trust in institutions, respect for diverse perspectives, and a collective sense of civic duty, as well as a commitment to democratic values and practices. Without a civic culture that enables collaborative deliberation and voluntary cooperation, efforts to site infrastructure in a community are more likely to devolve into contentious conflict rather than constructive problem-solving. When people do not respect the rule of law or the functionality of governing systems or if they lack trust in public servants and their fellow citizens the likelihood of meaningful engagement and compromise diminishes.
Local governments can lead by example, modeling transparency and fairness in their processes, and acknowledging legitimate concerns from diverse community members. Public officials, community leaders, and educators can encourage a sense of civic duty through open forums, regular town halls, and civic education curricula. Meanwhile, the media and civil society organizations—advocacy groups, faith-based communities, and neighborhood associations—can help sustain public engagement by showcasing positive examples of collective action, facilitating inclusive dialogue, and emphasizing shared values across potential divisions. Ultimately, a healthy civic culture does not arise from a single source; it is woven over time through broad-based collaboration, mutual respect, and a consistent commitment to upholding the foundational principles of democracy.
Explanation:
Shared perspectives on the collective identity, appropriate norms and practices, vision for the future, sense of community, and orientation toward the common good.
Ways to build/enhance:
Community-building events and celebrations, social norm-forming activities.
Social Capital and Network Benefits
Social capital is a measure of interconnectedness and commonality. By this we mean properties of relationships, including trust, respect, reciprocity, shared values and goals, and deep connections. When people belong to multiple groups and those groups intermingle with one another, people develop thick connections with each other, where “thick” suggests they relate frequently and on more than one level. For instance, they may connect with neighbors at a dance group, a religious service, in the schools, and at a sporting event. By connecting with one another in multiple venues, people come to know others in a non-singular way, which reduces the tendency to treat each other as one-dimensional.
Grassroots groups, nonprofits, and civic clubs can create programs that encourage regular, meaningful interaction. Local governments can support these efforts by allocating resources to community centers, parks, and public spaces that serve as hubs of connection. Private NGOs, foundations, or state agencies can fund staff whose role is to create network benefits by organizing intersectional events. Educational institutions also have a role to play in facilitating cross-sector relationships, whether through service-learning projects, multi-stakeholder forums, or joint research initiatives. Ultimately, social capital grows strongest when individuals, organizations, and public agencies understand its value and invest in the social infrastructure needed to sustain frequent and varied connections across the community.
Explanation:
Density of relationships characterized by trust, respect, reciprocity, shared values and goals, and deep connections
Ways to build/enhance:
Activities to build awareness and trust among organizations. Network mapping. Manufacture network benefits
Back to Top